Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the gd-system-plugin domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114

Deprecated: Array and string offset access syntax with curly braces is deprecated in /var/www/wp-content/plugins/gravityforms/common.php on line 4151

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the bb-booster domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /var/www/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6114
Correlating Lube Oil Filtration Efficiencies With Engine Wear - Gavarino Engineering LLC
Dayton, Ohio
Ordering +1 (937) 388-5221
Support@Gavarino.com

Correlating Lube Oil Filtration Efficiencies With Engine Wear

Extend The Life Of Your Oil. Extend The Life Of Your Engine.

Correlating Lube Oil Filtration Efficiencies With Engine Wear

SAE Paper # 881825 © 1988 SAE International. – This paper is published on this website with permission
from SAE International. As a user of this website, you are permitted to view this paper on-line, download
this .pdf file and print one copy at no cost for your use only. The downloaded .pdf file and printout of this
SAE paper may not be copied, distributed or forwarded to others or for the use of others.

The Following Is A Summary Of The
Society Of Automotive Engineers (SAE)
Paper Number 881825 Entitled
“Correlating Lube Oil Filtration Efficiencies With Engine Wear”
Written by David R. Staley of General Motors Corp.

AC Spark Plug and Detroit Diesel Corp. performed a joint study of the relationship between the level of
engine oil filtration and Engine wear rates, and found finer filtration reduced the rate of Engine wear.
Diesel and Gasoline Engine wear rates were established by building a Diesel and Gasoline Engine with
fully inspected wear components and inspecting them after the test. In both Engines, the upper and lower
main bearings, oil rings and compression rings were inspected. In the Diesel Engine, the cam lobe profile
and cylinders were also inspected, while the piston pin bushings, piston pins and cylinder liners of the Gasoline engine were inspected.

The total test duration was eight hours. To accelerate wear, 50 grams of AC Fine Test Dust was added, in
slurry form, to the crank case every hour.

Diesel Engine wear tests were performed using filters with high efficiency ratings for particle sizes: 40
Microns, 8.5 Microns and 7 Microns.

Gasoline Engines wear tests were performed using filters with high efficiency ratings for particle sizes of
the following sizes: 40 Microns, 30 Microns and 15 Microns.

ANALYSIS

The researchers found clearances in the Diesel and Gasoline Engines varied between 2 and 22 Microns
during engine operations. That means particles in the 2 to 22 Micron size range are most likely to damage
Engine parts. Particles smaller than 2 Microns will slip through the clearances without damaging bearing
surfaces.

CONCLUSIONS

The researchers drew the following conclusions:

Abrasive Engine wear can be substantially reduced with an increase in single pass
efficiency. Compared to a 40-Micron filter, Gasoline Engine wear was reduced by 50
percent with 30-Micron filtration. Likewise, wear was reduced by 70 percent with 15-
Micron filtration. Controlling the abrasive contaminants in the range of 2 to 22 Microns in
the lube oil is necessary for controlling Engine wear.

“The Micron rating of a filter as established in a single pass efficiency type test, does an excellent job
indicating the filter’s ability to remove abrasive particles in the Engine lube oil system.”
The smallest particles most popular “full Flow” filters capture with high efficiency are sized 25 to 40 Microns, depending on the filter brand.